3 Comments
User's avatar
Jens Verbrugge's avatar

I think there is a typo in the example, in the calculation of the working capital. Should be 1,085 if I'm not mistaken. But I like the idea.

I wonder if, conceptually, it would be even better still if some sort of correction is made to account for growth in the "changes in working capital". To exclude the growth component of sales in here, in a similar way as the growth component of capex is excluded. But I have to streamline my ideas to be sure. Thoughts? :)

Expand full comment
Maverick Equity Research's avatar

great take, thank you, keep it rocking!

Expand full comment
Sanelisiwe's avatar

Good read, informative.

Expand full comment